There is no toxic score here

A backlink tool is expected to tell you which links are bad and to generate a file asking Google to ignore them. This one does neither, and the omission is a decision rather than a gap in the build.

Grading somebody else’s site

A toxicity score is a judgement delivered as a number, about a party who is not the customer, from one summary row of theirs. We are not willing to make it. What the screen shows instead is the distrust figure the index itself reports, named as that index’s own measurement rather than as a verdict, and counted rather than summed into a grade.

That count is over the referring domains this product stored, which are the strongest part of your profile by the index’s own ranking — so it is a count within a sample rather than a share of everything that links to you, and the screen prints the population beside it instead of hiding it in a tooltip.

A disavow file

A disavow file is an instruction to a search engine about which of your own links to ignore, and it would be built here on evidence this product does not have. There is nothing in this product that writes one and nothing that suggests one.

What is actually useful about the data

The question Backlink gap is built to answer is not which of your links are bad — it is which of the top domains linking to a rival you track are not among the top ones linking to you. That is a list you can act on, each row naming the rivals it was found on, and it needs no judgement about anybody’s morality to be worth reading.

What is not measured at all

There is no list of individual links here, so there is no list of lost links and no list of broken ones. The history is counted by week — how many referring domains arrived and how many went — which is what the summary this product asks for actually reports.